1756 Vaugondy Map of the German Empire
This item has been sold.
Carte de l'Empire d'Allemagne divisé en ses dix cercles, dessinée d'après les Cartes Nationales assujeties aux observations astronomiques.
Striking old color Vaugondy map of the German Empire.
- Digital Map Information
- Suitable for large format printing
- DPI: 300
- File Size: 14.79 MB
- File Type: ZIP / TIFF
- ICC color profile embedded
- Delivered instantly via download link
Striking old color Vaugondy map of the German Empire.
This is a 1756 Gilles Robert de Vaugondy map of the German Empire. The map depicts the German Empire divided into various imperial circles, duchies, and states. The Circles of Westphalia, High and Low Saxony, and Bavaria are depicted, as well as Bohemia and Silesia am others. These regions are bordered by Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Prussia, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Italy and Switzerland. The borders between these political entities are depicted in gorgeous old color. Several interesting regional labels are worth mentioning, including the Republic of Venice and Champagne, Alsace, and Lorraine in France. The German Sea and the Baltic Sea are labeled. Innumerable cities and towns cover the map, including Munich, Prague (Prag), Geneva, and Frankfurt (Francfort). An elaborate title cartouche is presented at the lower left, dominated by an eagle holding a sword and a religious staff in it talons. The title is surrounded in laurels and, at the bottom, a crown and orb are depicted, perhaps referring to the many different principalities depicted on the map.This map was drawn by Gilles Roberty de Vaugondy, the géographe ordinaire du Roi, de l'Academie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Nancy in 1756. It was published in his Atlas Universel.
Cartographer
Robert de Vaugondy (fl. c. 1716 - 1786) was a French publishing firm run by Gilles (1688 - 1766) and Didier (c. 1723 - 1786) Robert de Vaugondy. They were map publishers, engravers, and cartographers active in Paris during the mid-18th century. Gilles was the nephew of Pierre Moulard Sanson, and was thus the inheritor of Nicolas Sanson (1600 - 1667), whose stock supplied much of their initial material and whose legacy supplied much of their initial reputation. Graduating from Sanson's maps, Gilles, and more particularly Didier, began to produce their own substantial corpus. The Vaugondys were well-respected for the detail and accuracy of their maps, for which they capitalized on the resources of 18th-century Paris to compile the most accurate and fantasy-free maps possible. The Vaugondys compiled each map based on their own geographic knowledge, scholarly research, journals of contemporary explorers and missionaries, and direct astronomical observation. Moreover, unlike many cartographers of this period, they took pains to reference their sources. Nevertheless, even in 18th-century Paris, geographical knowledge was limited - especially regarding those unexplored portions of the world, including the poles, the Pacific Northwest of America, and the interiors of Africa, Australia, and South America. This gap in knowledge let to divergent geographical approaches, epitomized by the Buache-Vaugondy debates at the French Academie des Sciences - one of the key pivotal moments in the history of modern cartography. Buache, in his Exposé, argued for a Theoretical Geography, which postulated that a systematic and scientific approach could accurately fill in the map in advance of actual exploration. Vaugondy's scathing critique of the Exposé, presented as the Considerations, argued for empirical restraint in cartography, suggesting that unexplored areas should simply be left blank and that mapping itself should rely on documentable current discovery. While Bucahe, with more political acumen and connections, initially came out ahead in the debates, the subsequent decades saw voyages of discovery by Captains James Cook, Jean Francois de Galaup de La Perouse, and George Vancouver disprove most of his map. Nonetheless, by that time, Vaugondy, advanced in age, did not live long enough to see his approach become ascendant. Didier died more celebrated than solvent, and his maps were acquired by Jean-Baptiste Fortin, who in 1787 sold them to Charles-François Delamarche (1740 - 1817). Delamarche, more businessman than cartographer, prospered from the Vaugondy maps, but defrauded Vaugondy's widow, Marie Louise Rosalie Dangy, of her rightful inheritance and may even have killed her. Further Details...
Source
Robert de Vaugondy, G., Atlas Universel, (Paris: Antoine Boudet) 1757.
The Atlas Universel was the crowning glory of the Robert de Vaugondy firm's atlas production. The atlas was revolutionary on many levels and exemplified the Vaugondy credo commode, complet, univorme, et suive (convenient, complete, uniform, and easy to use). The atlas thus consisted of a wide corpus of maps, both modern and historical, was of moderate height and width, and featured maps of uniform style and structure. They partnered with Antoine Boudet, a shrewd businessman and publisher with whom they had worked previously, to produce the 1752 first edition. To minimize his fiscal risk, Boudet sold the atlas first by subscription using a large prospectus, receiving in the process over 1100 pre-orders. The first edition appeared in 1752 and contained beautifully produced maps with elaborate freshly designed allegorical cartouche work, generally by Pierre-Edme Babel, Pierre Philippe Choffard, and Charles Nicholas Cochin. Most of the maps were engraved by the Delahaye firm, the payment for whose services ultimately led to legal disputes. Despite proving a popular work of astounding quality, the Atlas Universal received harsh criticism from fellow cartographers, particularly Philipppe Buache. Ever at odds with the Vaugondys, Buache's critical perspective may have been influenced more by political maneuvering than academic affront. The atlas was issued in multiple editions between 1752 and 1788. Later editions, issued after 1786, were taken over by Charles Delamarche, who inherited the Robert de Vaugondy firm and assumed Boudet's publication rights.
Condition
Very good. Repaired split along original centerfold repaired on verso.
References
Rumsey 3353.056.